Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms Of Service
    • Legal Disclaimer
    • Social Media Disclaimer
    • DMCA Compliance
    • Anti-Spam Policy
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Brief ChainBrief Chain
    • Home
    • Crypto News
      • Bitcoin
      • Ethereum
      • Altcoins
      • Blockchain
      • DeFi
    • AI News
    • Stock News
    • Learn
      • AI for Beginners
      • AI Tips
      • Make Money with AI
    • Reviews
    • Tools
      • Best AI Tools
      • Crypto Market Cap List
      • Stock Market Overview
      • Market Heatmap
    • Contact
    Brief ChainBrief Chain
    Home»Crypto News»DeFi»AI-Assisted Attackers Target Hidden DeFi Code
    Cointelegraph
    DeFi

    AI-Assisted Attackers Target Hidden DeFi Code

    June 10, 20263 Mins Read
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
    kraken


    Unverified smart contracts were linked to at least $36.7 million in losses across four DeFi exploits over the past six months, as attackers increasingly target protocols whose source code is not publicly available, according to Chainalysis.

    The largest incident involved Truebit, which lost $26.2 million after an attacker exploited an integer overflow vulnerability in a contract that had remained unverified on Ethereum since 2021. The other incidents involved Trusted Volumes, Aperture Finance and Ekubo, according to the report.

    In each case, the exploited contract had not been verified on a blockchain explorer, meaning its source code was not publicly available for review. According to Chainalysis, that limited scrutiny from security researchers and excluded the contracts from many bug bounty programs despite controlling user funds.

    Five protocols saw exploits on unverified smart contracts. Source: Chainalysis

    binance

    Chainalysis attributed the trend in part to advances in decompilation tools and artificial intelligence, which can help attackers reverse-engineer smart contract bytecode and identify vulnerabilities even when source code is not publicly available. According to the report, what once required “a skilled reverse engineer spending days on a single contract” can now be partially automated across large numbers of unverified contracts.

    The report challenges a longstanding assumption in DeFi that keeping smart contract code private provides an additional layer of security. According to Chainalysis, protocols relying on hidden code are increasingly depending on “obscurity as a security measure,” an approach the company said is rapidly losing effectiveness. 

    Chainalysis recommended source code verification, broader bug bounty coverage and real-time monitoring tools as safeguards against future exploits.

    Related: Humanity Protocol token falls 85% amid $30M private key exploit

    DeFi security concerns persist after record April losses

    The report comes amid a broader rise in crypto exploits. According to DeFiLlama, hackers stole $629.7 million in April alone, the highest monthly total since February 2025.

    Two incidents accounted for most of the losses. KelpDAO lost $293 million and Drift Protocol suffered a $280 million exploit, together representing more than 80% of the month’s stolen funds.

    Although losses fell sharply in May, with CertiK reporting $68.3 million stolen from cryptocurrency exploits, the fallout from April’s largest attacks continued. In June, blockchain intelligence platform Arkham reported that the attacker behind the KelpDAO exploit had laundered nearly all of the roughly $220 million in unfrozen stolen funds.

    Kelp DAO Hacker-tagged wallet, total balance. Source: Arkham

    The KelpDAO exploit also prompted several DeFi protocols to review their security infrastructure, with projects including Solv Protocol announcing plans to migrate to Chainlink’s crosschain infrastructure following internal security reviews.

    This month, Anthropic said 560 of the 832 accounts it banned for policy violations over a one-year period had used AI to help prepare cyberattacks, including writing malware and identifying vulnerabilities.

    Magazine: The legal battle over who can claim DeFi’s stolen millions



    Source link

    notion
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    CryptoExpert
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Morpho’s $175M DeFi Round Tests Onchain Credit’s Future

    June 14, 2026

    Anthropic Mythos Security Audit Found No ‘Serious’ Bugs in Zcash: Wilcox

    June 13, 2026

    AI Models Led to ‘Vulnerability Apocalypse’ in Crypto Security: Immunefi CEO

    June 11, 2026

    Autonomous AI Agents Pose Crypto Financial Risks

    June 11, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    kraken
    Latest Posts

    Full Claude Tutorial For Beginners: Become a Pro in Just 14 Minutes

    June 14, 2026

    Dogecoin (DOGE) Could Be on the Verge of a Parabolic Move: Analyst

    June 14, 2026

    Botanix Pulls Plug on Bitcoin L2 After 4 Years as Fee Income Falls Short

    June 14, 2026

    Ethereum Staking Demand Surges as 3 million ETH Queue While Exit Activity Fades

    June 14, 2026

    The SpaceX IPO Is Finally Here. What Does It Mean for Bitcoin Investors?

    June 14, 2026
    frase
    LEGAL INFORMATION
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms Of Service
    • Legal Disclaimer
    • Social Media Disclaimer
    • DMCA Compliance
    • Anti-Spam Policy
    Top Insights

    Congress Targets Crypto ATMs After Americans Lose $333M to Scams

    June 15, 2026

    Metaplanet to Launch Bitcoin Yield Products by Acquiring Siiibo Securities

    June 14, 2026
    synthesia
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    © 2026 BriefChain.com - All rights reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.